Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Antoine Hoang vs Jan Choinski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoang vs Choinski analysis and find out who is favored!
Antoine Hoang vs Jan Choinski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hoang 1 - 0 Choinski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoang has won 50.75% of points on his second serve, while Choinski has won 53.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoang, in recent form, has won 52.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Choinski has won 49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.51% and 29.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoang has saved 62.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Choinski has saved 63.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoang has won 58.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 23), with Choinski winning 45.45% (W/L 30/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 140/ 96), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 63/ 50). Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 199/ 120), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Hoang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.75% of matches (W/L 32/ 19), where as Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoang winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoang winning 2 and Choinski winning 0. The last match between Hoang and Choinski was at the Ortisei Challenger, 14-11-2019, Third, I.hard with Antoine Hoang getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoang and Choinski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoang winning 0 times and Choinski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoang winning 0, and Choinski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoang has played against opponents with an average rank of 174.84 while Choinski has played against players with an average rank of 247.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoang has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Choinski has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoang has converted 43.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Choinski has converted 44.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
500
Rank
98
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
180
Rank
126
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
58% (383-274)
Career Total W/L
59% (358-246)
66% (19-10)
YTD W/L
41% (11-16)
$522,575
Career Prize Money
$185,015
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Antoine Hoang | Jan Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:41 | 1:12:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (48/64) | 69% (40/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (34/48) | 73% (29/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 50% (9/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (20/58) | 30% (19/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Antoine Hoang
Player
Jan Choinski
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Antoine Hoang | Jan Choinski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (19/10) | 41% (11/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (42/23) | 46% (29/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (331/285) | 51% (310/297) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 50% (7/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (18/9) | 30% (3/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 113 | 121 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 102 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:4 | 1:43:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.21 | 253.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1339/1936) | 67% (1308/1959) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (954/1339) | 69% (896/1308) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (303/597) | 53% (348/651) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (78/181) | 45% (69/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (773/1984) | 37% (707/1919) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 35% (6/11) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (19/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (19/29) | 41% (11/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 31% (4/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 22% (2/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 6% (17/1) |
Antoine Hoang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Antoine Hoang
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Mae Malige
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Antoine Hoang
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Nicolas Ifi
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Antoine Hoang
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Antoine Hoang
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Antoine Hoang
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
12
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Daniil Glinka
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Mika Brunold
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Choinski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Jan Choinski
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
81%
(
13 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Jan Choinski
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Tristan Boyer
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Zachary Svajda
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Jan Choinski
47%
(
39 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Benjamin Hassan
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
6 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Jan Choinski
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
83 of
119)
21
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
54 of
83)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
26%
(
25 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(7) 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Henri Haupt
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jan Choinski
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Joao Fonseca
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hoang Vs Choinski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
